Indirect Pressure ("Chilling Effect")

Incidents documented against civil activists – April 2024

Context

Monitoring conducted in April 2024 showed a significant escalation of violations against civil activists in Georgia. This period coincided with the re-initiation of the so-called “Russian law”, which triggered large-scale, continuous and intensive protests in various cities across the country, particularly in Tbilisi.

A significant number of the incidents documented in April were linked to peaceful assemblies, protest marches and demonstrations. In most cases, law enforcement bodies were involved, indicating a broader trend of state control over civic space and restrictions on protest. The monitoring data, based on footage disseminated by the media and reports by the Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association and the Public Defender of Georgia,(see: Public Defender, 16–17 April; Public Defender, 30 April; GYLA, 30 April) shows that both administrative and coercive measures were used against activists. In several cases, these measures resulted in restrictions on the freedoms of assembly and expression, physical violence and indirect pressure.

Incidents

On 7 April 2024, activists who were removing hate-related posters in the Marjanishvili area were obstructed by party activists affiliated with Georgian Dream. The civil activists called law enforcement officers to the scene; however, the police took the activists for questioning and released them only the following morning.

On 15 April 2024, during a protest against the “Russian law”, police detained 14 citizens. Some of those detained reported violence by police officers, which was also confirmed by the Deputy Public Defender, Elene Ghudushauri. According to the Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association, most of the detainees did not have adequate access to communication with family members and lawyers. According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, four of the 14 detainees were released on the basis of a written undertaking.

On 16–17 April 2024, during the dispersal of a protest against the so-called “Russian law”, police forces used physical force against peaceful demonstrators. In its report, the Public Defender noted that footage disseminated by media outlets indicated the use of disproportionate force by special-purpose police units against citizens. For example, a police officer knocked down and physically assaulted protest participant Dimitri Beridze. Beridze was transferred to a clinic and sustained a concussion as a result of the incident. In another case, officers of the Special Tasks Department cornered a young man in a side street and physically assaulted him. According to the citizen, masked individuals chased him and struck him in the face area with a baton. Civil activist Mariam Dolidze was also physically assaulted by special forces officers. She sustained an elbow injury and required surgery. In addition, police detained 18 persons, including Gela Khasaia, Levan Jobava, Sandro and Giga Jokhadze, Levan Budaghashvili, Tornike Maruashvili, Isako Devidze, G.B., D.G. and others. Signs of physical violence were also identified in this incident: five of the detainees had to be transferred to a clinic. This information was also confirmed by the Minister of Health. The Public Defender also referred in its report to allegations of ill-treatment of detainees.

The Public Defender stated that on the evening of 16 April, during the protest against the so-called “Russian law”, the situation escalated several times. Pepper spray was used by law enforcement officers even in response to non-violent approaches by protesters. Cases were also identified in which peaceful participants were chased in order to force them to leave the area. The Public Defender stated that such actions clearly constituted an unjustified interference with the freedom of assembly. The Public Defender further emphasized that “one of the most important elements of the freedom of assembly is the freedom to choose the location of an assembly, which is of particular significance where a specific place or institution is the object of protest, or where expressing views at a specific location is the most effective means of conveying an opinion or protest to its intended addressee.”

On 18 April 2024, in connection with protests against the so-called “Russian law”, the Central Criminal Police summoned activists Niko Managadze, Tite Gedenidze, Beka Papashvili, Tsotne Japaridze and Igor Narmania for questioning.

On 19 April 2024, masked individuals were allegedly waiting near the residence of civil activist Niko Managadze. As soon as they noticed the TV Pirveli camera crew, they left the area. Managadze suspected that the unidentified individuals had come to his residence with the intention of physically attacking him.

On 20 April 2024, Niko Managadze, an activist opposing the so-called “Russian law”, was physically assaulted near the university, allegedly by individuals linked to Georgian Dream. The activist was first pushed by the security detail of Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze; subsequently, approximately ten young men physically assaulted him.

On 22 April 2024, civil activist, teacher and founder of a children’s literary club Mikheil Mumladze was detained near the Lado Meskhishvili Theatre in Kutaisi while draft laws restricting LGBT rights were being discussed inside the theatre. At the time the discussion began, Mumladze wrote on his Facebook page that he was not being allowed to attend the public discussion of the constitutional draft law and addressed Mamuka Mdinaradze, asking to be allowed into the building.

On 29 April 2024, Alexi Petriashvili was detained during a protest against the so-called “Russian law”. Police accused him of petty hooliganism and failure to comply with a lawful order of a police officer.

On 30 April 2024, the special-purpose unit of the Special Tasks Department dispersed a peaceful protest against the so-called “Russian law”. According to the Public Defender, during the night of 30 April and throughout 1 May, the Public Defender and its representatives visited 49 persons, of whom 47 had been detained under administrative procedure. Representatives visited temporary detention facilities in Tbilisi, Zugdidi, Telavi, Dusheti, Mtskheta, Gori and Khashuri. Thirty-one persons alleged ill-treatment and/or disproportionate use of force by police or special forces. Most of them had visible injuries. Nineteen of the 31 requested a response. According to publicly available information, police surrounded and detained activist Giorgi Dumbadze while he was giving an interview to TV Pirveli and saying that he would not stop fighting against the Russian law. Members of the special-purpose unit also physically assaulted Gela Nadiradze, who sustained injuries.

According to a report by the Georgian Young Lawyers’ Association, during the protest held near the Parliament of Georgia, members of the special-purpose unit used active special means without prior warning, including pepper spray discharged at close range and gas capsules. GYLA noted that protest participants were not given an opportunity to leave the area, as “police forces had encircled the demonstrators.”

According to the report, footage disseminated by the media also documented cases of physical violence against citizens, including women, while administrative detentions were carried out in parallel.

The Public Defender also assessed the protest of 30 April. According to the Public Defender, the force used by law enforcement officers in several cases failed to meet the standards of necessity and proportionality. The Public Defender stated that pepper spray and other special means, including tear gas and water cannon, were used against protest participants. The Public Defender emphasized that both at the time the warning was issued and afterwards, the assembly remained peaceful; therefore, there were no grounds for terminating the assembly or using force against peaceful demonstrators.

Actors dismissed from Marjanishvili Theatre

According to publicly available information, nine members of the troupe of Kote Marjanishvili State Academic Theatre were dismissed, including Eka Nizharadze, Natia Gubenko, Maia Katsitadze, Irakli Cholokashvili, Ninaka Gelashvili, Guram Jashi, and Zaza Iakashvili.

The theatre has not issued a public statement regarding any reorganization and has not provided reasons for the dismissals. According to the actors, in January, instead of the usual one-year contracts, they were offered three-month contracts, which expired on 30 April.

“I did not receive any official notification. They simply offered a three-month contract for the first time, and this was a sign for me that they intended to terminate the contract,” – stated Irakli Cholokashvili in an interview with TV Pirveli.

The dismissals took place against the backdrop of the active participation of part of the theatre community in anti-government and pro-European demonstrations. According to the dismissed actors and media reports, their civic engagement may have been the reason for the dismissals.

The State Security Service summoned human rights defender Ucha Nanuashvili for questioning

On 17 March, human rights defender Ucha Nanuashvili wrote on social media that he had been summoned for questioning at the State Security Service. According to him, the summons is related to his communication with an expert operating under the OSCE“Moscow Mechanism”.

Nanuashvili stated that an investigator from the State Security Service contacted him following a statement he made on television. In this context, “POSTV Analitika” disseminated a video on social media claiming that Ucha Nanuashvili had allegedly coordinated the report prepared under the Moscow Mechanism. Nanuashvili himself notes that this circumstance became the basis for summoning him for questioning.

Attention was also drawn to this issue during a briefing held by Irakli Kobakhidze on 16 March. In the context of the video disseminated by “POSTV”, a journalist from the pro-government channel “Rustavi 2” asked Irakli Kobakhidze about the possible role of Ucha Nanuashvili and inquired how noteworthy he considered this information. In response, Kobakhidze stated that “it would not be surprising for agents to be in coordination, and this is also evident from the published text; of course, there would have been full coordination with local agents.” Against the backdrop of these developments, Ucha Nanuashvili was summoned for questioning at the State Security Service the following day.

On 18 March, Ucha Nanuashvili was questioned before a magistrate judge. According to Nanuashvili, he provided the OSCE expert with information on the situation in the country and on human rights reports, which, in his assessment, constitutes an attempt to intimidate civil society in order to restrict future communication with international organisations. He further stated that the State itself had an obligation to cooperate with the expert, while paragraph 6 of the “Moscow Mechanism” requires participating States to refrain from any actions against individuals cooperating with the expert — a requirement which, according to Nanuashvili, has been violated.

The case is linked to the report prepared under the OSCE Moscow Mechanism, which was published on 12 March. The report provides a detailed account of the situation in Georgia since 2024, including democratic backsliding, the deterioration of human rights, and the persecution and repression of protest participants and the opposition. The “Moscow Mechanism” was invoked on 29 January by 24 OSCE participating States, leading to the establishment of an independent fact-finding mission, which prepared the report within a limited timeframe.

Searches of Protest Participants Near Parliament Continue for a Second Day

For the second day, law enforcement officers have been subjecting individuals to searches and identity checks in the vicinity of the Parliament of Georgia. According to the authorities, these measures are being carried out for the purposes of ensuring security and pursuant to the Law on Assemblies and Manifestations. According to law enforcement officials, individuals who refuse to undergo a superficial search will be denied access to the area surrounding the Parliament and the protest site.

According to citizens, the checks are being conducted without the preparation of a written record and are carried out on an oral basis. One individual reportedly requested that a formal record be drawn up; however, law enforcement officers indicated that, in such circumstances, the individual would not be permitted to enter the protest area.

Police Conduct Searches of Protest Participants Near Parliament

On 12 March, a notable deployment of law enforcement personnel was observed on Rustaveli Avenue, in the area surrounding the Parliament building, where officers were conducting checks of individuals participating in a public assembly. According to information disseminated on social media by photographer Giorgi Mosiashvili, law enforcement officials were reportedly subjecting all individuals carrying bags to searches.Participants in the assembly indicated that such measures were carried out in the absence of clearly articulated legal grounds or prior explanation, raising concerns regarding compliance with applicable standards. It was further reported that officers were inspecting bags with the apparent purpose of identifying and preventing the entry of tents into the area surrounding the Parliament, thereby potentially restricting the ability of demonstrators to sustain their presence at the site.

Fire Reported in Tent of Activist Darejan Tskhvitariia Near Parliament

On 12 March, activist Darejan Tskhvitariia, who had been spending nights in a tent near the Parliament of Georgia as part of an ongoing protest, stated that her tent caught fire during the night. According to her account, at approximately 3:00 a.m. she heard an unidentified individual shouting that something was burning, and upon going outside, she observed that her tent was on fire. Tskhvitariia expressed the view that the fire may have been set in order to remove the tents. She further stated that, following the incident, her personal belongings were taken from the tent.

According to Tskhvitariia, law enforcement officers arrived at the scene and officers from the Old Tbilisi district police were called. She stated that police officers requested that she leave the area, forcibly took her mobile phone, and removed her from the site using physical force. Notwithstanding the above, she indicated her intention to continue the protest.According to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Georgia, an investigation has been initiated under Article 188(2) of the Criminal Code of Georgia, which concerns damage to or destruction of property through negligent handling of fire or another source of increased danger.

Following Public Statements and Research on Iranian Influence, State Security Service Calls Individuals in for Questioning

Following public statements and the publication of two critical reports concerning potential Iranian influence in Georgia, the State Security Service of Georgia (SSG) called several individuals in for questioning in connection with an investigation opened under Article 319 of the Criminal Code of Georgia. The investigation concerns potential assistance to a foreign state, foreign organization, or an entity under foreign control in activities directed against the interests of the state.

As part of the investigation, opposition politician and historian Gubaz Sanikidze was interviewed before a magistrate judge on 7 March. On 8 March, former Minister of Defence and head of Civic Idea Tina Khidasheli, as well as co-author of a report by the Hudson Institute and project manager at the Laboratory for the Study of the Soviet Past, Giorgi Kandelaki, were interviewed at the Tbilisi City Court. During the same period, former Chief of the General Staff, Major General Vakhtang Kapanadze, was also called in for questioning and interviewed as a witness by the SSG. Former Member of Parliament Givi Targamadze was likewise called in; he stated that he is currently outside Georgia and will provide written responses or respond upon his return.

The questioning related to public statements made in televised broadcasts and to research concerning Iran. On 3 March, the Hudson Institute published a report asserting that the Islamic Republic of Iran is “systematically and in an organized manner” expanding its influence in Georgia. The report highlights several areas of concern, including developments in the Kvemo Kartli region and an educational institution operating in Gardabani without proper authorization. The issue of Iranian influence is also addressed in a report by Civic Idea, which examines the import of Iranian oil and petroleum products into Georgia and the potential links of companies involved in this activity.

Following the publication of these reports and related public statements, on 5 and 6 March, the Mayor of Tbilisi and Secretary General of Georgian Dream, Kakha Kaladze, publicly criticized Tina Khidasheli and Giorgi Kandelaki. He characterized their statements and research as “hostile activity against the country” and stated that “the relevant authorities should take an interest.” According to Kaladze, such statements undermine relations between Georgia and the United States.